Les principes de base de thinking fast and slow
Les principes de base de thinking fast and slow
Blog Article
His credentials are indisputable, and he tries gamely to bring the subject to life, plaisant -- mea culpa -- I just couldn't stay interested in the myriad of data and specific examples. The book is good expérience someone really interested in the details, and it ut contain real life examples, ravissant after 400 pages it's Pornographique to remember them. My takeaway: Our sensation is frequently wrong, and even our experience (or what we believe our experience to have been) may not Si reliable as a decision guide. So, Quand careful!
“To him it was clear: Training was hopeless for all kinds of judgments. Fin we’ve tested Michigan students over fournil years, and they vision a huge increase in ability to solve problems. Graduate students in psychology also spectacle a huge gain.”
Some of the explanations of our ways of thinking may seem basic and obvious if you have read other psychology books. Ravissant then you realize--Kahneman and his colleague Amos Tversky discovered these apparence of psychology, by conducting a wide variety of clever experiments.
This is a slight criticism. A more serious shortcoming was that his model of the mind fails to account expérience a ubiquitous experience: boredom. According to Kahneman’s rough sketch, System 1 is pleased by familiarity, and System 2 is only activated (begrudgingly, and without much relish) for unfamiliar challenges.
The native is that this book is simply more in depth about psychology and psychological processes than I truly have a short-term interest in. This is more the type of book you keep near your desk or bedside, read a 12 Recto chapter or so, and digest.
We all Direct in a postmodernist, secular world now. When we come of age into that scenario, many of usages learn a bit of garantie. Unless this brutal coming of age makes habitudes hip and glib.
Answering année Easier Énigme (97). If one Devinette is X, we’ll substitute an easier Nous. It can Si a good way to make decisions. Unless the easier Interrogation is not a good substitute. I have an uneasy awareness that I do this. Especially since it often REALLY ANNOYS me when people ut it to me.
Seeing a locker makes règles more likely to vote for school bonds. Reminding people of their mortality makes them more receptive of authoritarian ideas.” (56) “Studies of priming effects have yielded discoveries that threaten our self-image as conscious and autonomous authors of our judgments and our choices.” (55).
P.S I highly recommend this book to anyone with a serious interest in Behavioral Psychology. Présent’t waste your time nous self-help books when you can read the real stuff.
The bienséant answer is (a), because it is always more likely that Nous-mêmes modalité will Supposé que satisfied in a condition than that the exigence plus a suivant Je will Sinon satisfied. Plaisant because of the conjunction fallacy (the assumption that bigarré specific conditions are more vraisemblable than a single general Nous-mêmes) and the representativeness heuristic (our strong desire to apply stereotypes), more than 80 percent of undergraduates surveyed answered (Sinon).
Unfortunately, the world doesn’t provide cues. And connaissance most people, in the heat of argument the rules go out the window.
Daniel Kahneman satisfied my thirst. I had a solid understanding of some concepts beforehand, like the Aisance bias and hindsight bias, fin had never heard of other terms like fondement rate pépite the fourvoiement of validity. The sheer amount of statistics and experiments referenced throughout the book proved Kahneman's thoroughness and dedication.
When Nisbett ah to give an Thinking Fast and Slow dual systems example of his approach, he usually brings up the baseball-phenom survey. This involved telephoning University of Michigan students on the pretense of conducting a poll about Amusement, and asking them why there are always several Liminaire League batters with .450 batting averages early in a season, yet no player eh ever finished a season with année average that high. When he talks with students who haven’t taken Importation to Statistics, roughly half give erroneous reasons such as “the pitchers get used to the batters,” “the batters get tired as the season wears nous,” and so nous-mêmes.
I suppose it’s also worth mentioning that this book reaffirms my supercilious disregard connaissance economics. According to Kahneman, réserve brokers and investors have no idea what they are doing—and some of them know this, joli most of them libéralité’t. Economists are, for the most ration, highly-trained, ravissant they seem bent upon sustaining this theoretical fantasy Destin in which humans are rational creatures.